Architectural and Semantic Dimensions of Low-Latency Web APIs in High-Transaction Information Systems
Keywords:
Low-latency Web APIs, high-transaction systems, API architecture, semantic interoperabilityAbstract
The accelerating dependence of contemporary digital infrastructures on web-based application programming interfaces has positioned low-latency Web APIs as a foundational component of high-transaction information systems across governmental, scientific, and industrial domains. As digital ecosystems expand in scale and complexity, the performance characteristics of APIs increasingly determine not only system responsiveness but also institutional capacity for innovation, interoperability, and real-time decision-making. This article develops a comprehensive, theory-driven examination of low-latency Web API design within high-transaction environments, integrating architectural, semantic, governance, and socio-technical perspectives drawn from several decades of research on distributed systems, data integration, and service-oriented computing. Building on recent empirical benchmarking work on latency-sensitive API architectures in transaction-intensive systems (Valiveti, 2025), the study situates low-latency APIs within broader historical trajectories of data integration, semantic interoperability, and platform governance.
The article advances three central arguments. First, low-latency performance cannot be reduced to infrastructural optimization alone but must be understood as an emergent property of architectural decisions, semantic modeling practices, and organizational governance structures. Second, the evolution of Web APIs reflects unresolved tensions between scalability, interpretability, and institutional accountability, particularly evident in government and large-scale public-sector systems. Third, current benchmarking approaches, while technically rigorous, often under-theorize the socio-technical implications of latency reduction, including its effects on knowledge discovery, policy responsiveness, and ethical system behavior.
The discussion section engages extensively with competing scholarly viewpoints on API minimalism, semantic enrichment, and machine-assisted API discovery, offering a critical reassessment of dominant design paradigms. Particular attention is given to the implications of low-latency APIs for government digital services, large-scale analytics, and AI-enabled platforms, where transaction volume and response time intersect with public values and institutional trust. The article concludes by outlining a future research agenda that calls for integrative evaluation frameworks capable of capturing both the technical and societal consequences of low-latency API ecosystems. By reconceptualizing latency as a socio-technical phenomenon rather than a purely technical metric, the study contributes a deeper theoretical foundation for the design and evaluation of next-generation Web APIs in high-transaction systems.
References
The missing piece in complex analytics: Low latency, scalable model management and serving with velox. Crankshaw, D., Bailis, P., Gonzalez, J. E., Li, H., Zhang, Z., Franklin, M. J., Ghodsi, A., Jordan, M. I. CIDR, 2015.
API Strategy and Use in Government: Challenges and Opportunities. European Commission, 2020.
Large scale distributed deep networks. Dean, J., Corrado, G., Monga, R., Chen, K., Devin, M., Mao, M., Ranzato, M. A., Senior, A., Tucker, P., Yang, K., Le, Q. V., Ng, A. Y. NIPS, 2012.
Low-Latency Web APIs in High-Transaction Systems: Design and Benchmarking. Valiveti, S. S., 2025. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3).
Understanding initial API comprehension. Heinonen, A., Fagerholm, F. ICPC, 2023.
A common API for e-Government services: A technical blueprint. Parycek, P., Leitner, C. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 2018.
Three decades of data integration all problems solved? Ziegler, P., Dittrich, K. R. IFIP Congress Topical Sessions, 2004.
On the formulation of performant sparql queries. Loizou, A., Groth, P. CoRR, 2013.
Improving API Knowledge Discovery with ML: A Case Study of Comparable API Methods. Nam, D., et al. ICSE, 2023.
Linked data is merely more data. Jain, P., Hitzler, P., Yeh, P. Z., Verma, K., Sheth, A. P. AAAI Spring Symposium, 2010.
What the semantic web could do for the life sciences. Neumann, E. K., Miller, E., Wilbanks, J. Drug Discovery Today BIOSILICO, 2004.
Assessing the success factors of API platforms in government services. Lee, G., Kwak, Y. H. Sustainability, 2020.
The development trend of government information system based on API technology. Fang, Z., Zhang, J. ACM, 2020.
Powergraph: Distributed graph-parallel computation on natural graphs. Gonzalez, J. E., Low, Y., Gu, H., Bickson, D., Guestrin, C. OSDI, 2012.
Including co-referent uris in a sparql query. Brenninkmeijer, Y. A., Goble, C., Gray, A. J. G., Groth, P., Loizou, A., Pettifer, S. COLD, 2013.
The YouTube video recommendation system. Davidson, J., Liebald, B., Liu, J., Nandy, P., Van Vleet, T., Gargi, U., Gupta, S., He, Y., Lambert, M., Livingston, B., Sampath, D. RecSys, 2010.
Aisha: A custom AI library chatbot using the ChatGPT API. Lappalainen, Y., Narayanan, N. Journal of Web Librarianship, 2023.
C3: Internet-Scale Control Plane for Video Quality Optimization. Ganjam, A., Siddiqui, F., Zhan, J., Liu, X., Stoica, I., Jiang, J., Sekar, V., Zhang, H. NSDI, 2015.
Practical experience with the maintenance and auditing of a large medical oncology. Baorto, D., Li, L., Cimino, J. J. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009.
Web-Scale Bayesian Click-Through rate Prediction for Sponsored Search Advertising in Microsofts Bing Search Engine. Graepel, T., Candela, J. Q., Borchert, T., Herbrich, R. ICML, 2010.
Darpa timit acoustic phonetic continuous speech corpus cdrom. Garofolo, J. S., Lamel, L. F., Fisher, W. M., Fiscus, J. G., Pallett, D. S., Dahlgren, N. L., 1993.
The 3GPP common API framework: Open-source release and application use cases. Charismiadis, A. S., et al. IEEE EuCNC and 6G Summit, 2023.
